SEE LATEST POST HERE:
https://tamamshud.blogspot.com/2023/08/somerton-man-fake-photo.html
...THE WEB FAMILY GROUP
PICTURES OF CHARLIE...
A TRUTH REVEALED
The comparison pictures are from the same basic photograph and at first glance they may appear to be identical. However, a closer look shows some significant differences as you can see in the marked-up image below:
IMAGE 1.
- Note that the left ear as marked on the left photo is quite clear, you can see the outer and inner helix and the shape of the inner ear. You can also make out there is a small lobe on the left ear, the ear is not attached.
- Next, let's look at the mouth. In image #1 on the left, we can see that Carl has a 'twisted' smile. It is not a fault in the image, he just happens to smile that way and there is no sign of any digital artifact at play. Some of the teeth in the lower jaw are not visible. The upper teeth are clearly visible.
- The face itself looks to be quite tanned, it is certainly not pale and the skin is smooth apart from the wrinkled forehead which may be a result of the AI enhancement but as you will see further below, there are indeed signs of wrinkling on the original photograph.
IMAGE 2.
- The left ear in this image is noticeably different, the inner ear shape is smaller and not well-defined, and the ear appears to be longer than that shown in IMAGE #1. You can also see that the lobe is now missing and the lower part of the ear appears to be square cut into the jaw and it is attached. The upper part of the ear has been modified and has a pronounced semi-circular appearance. The ear in this image looks to have been photoshopped.
- The mouth is totally different in shape from that found in the first image, with IMAGE #1 having a 'twisted' smile and IMAGE 2 being more regular in shape and the lower teeth are now visible. There is no sign of a smile. The upper teeth are barely visible.This part of the image appears to have also been photoshopped
- The face has an almost metallic finish to it and whilst there are signs of wrinkling, they are light and do not look natural. Once more the impression is that the face has been deliberately photoshopped.
THE FAMILY GROUP PHOTOGRAPHS
Below you can see both versions of the same photograph that were published by ABC in Australia. The first version is the plain black-and-white image of the group. The second image shows the same group but with different coloured inks showing the names of each person and the locations of the name tags on the image have been changed from their original position.
INITIAL/ORIGINAL BLACK AND WHITE PHOTOGRAPH:
The names are all written in a grey colour which might be a pencil and they are located as seen in this image, near the top of the image.
MODIFIED IMAGE PUBLISHED LATER
In this image, you can see that the name tags have not only been moved but the colours have been changed.
At the sizes shown, the changes that were made were quite minor until you enhance and improve each image and it is then that you see the significant effects of the changes that have been made.
The clothes worn by each person are the same as those worn by the same people in the larger family group, this shows that Carl at this time was in his mid to late 20s which would put both photographs as being taken in 1930 or thereabouts.
Here's the large family group:
The clothes worn by each person are the same as those worn by the same people in the larger family group, this shows that Carl at this time was in his mid to late 20s which would put both photographs as being taken in 1930 or thereabouts.
Here's the large family group:
There is a history of such manipulation of images emanating from the Professor Abbott camp. Some time ago I published an example that clearly showed that fine details of an image had been deliberately altered. Is this the case with the Webb Family photographs?
The devil, as they say, is in the detail.
You be the judge.
The devil, as they say, is in the detail.
You be the judge.
NEW PHOTO MARKED UP SHOWING ODDITIES:
These are a some of the oddities in the family pic. You can see the different shadow angles, the feint square outline of the clone stamp, the huge left arm , the smudge marks.