Quantcast
Channel: TAMAMSHUD
Viewing all 1073 articles
Browse latest View live

Somerton Man. Proof that miniature writing and use of Iodine were established techniques.

$
0
0
In a recent post it was suggested that iodine may have been used by the SA Police to reveal the indentations found on the back of the Omar book.

The image below is an example of Iodine, this time brushed on I think, being used to reveal secret writing on a handkerchief handed over by a German Submarine Commander when he and his crew surrendered to the Americans in 1945.

This next image shows US agents examining postal items using iodine and other chemicals in their search for secret writings:

This image shows the use of UV light by US censors:



First some history on this and just why this post is important. Almost 2 years ago on a site dedicated to finding out who the Somerton Man was, what he did and how he died, I put forward some findings I had made related to the existence of miniature writing as in very small, microscopic letters and numbers found both on the free spaces on the so called 'Code' page and interestingly also found beneath the 'letters' of the code. I didn't get the response I expected, the idea and even the images were met with derision and outrage.

I later found that this is quite a common occurrence when people who have dedicated much time and effort in the pursuit of a theory which would be destroyed should this new idea be accepted. It is a classic example of resistance to change and is to be expected. If you are ever faced with this, you simply need to have faith in yourself and pursue your ideas until eventually the idea becomes the truth and is accepted. If you know you are right, that is what will happen. Be understanding of those whose ideas have been sidelined, in my case I believe that their contribution has been massive and is not be derided.

Worthy of note is the fact that I had no idea that there was such a thing as miniature writing at the time, it was a surprise for me as well as anyone else. Neither did I have any real idea of the techniques used to reveal 'secret' writings whether done in ink or as miniature writings or, as it turns out, as both.

About two weeks ago, whilst doing some research I came across an article from a US newspaper dated 1936. You can read the full text via the link but for the purpose of this post, I can tell you that miniature writing and Iodine as a detection method are both mentioned in the article. Here's the link:


What this does is to prove that the use of miniature writing was a known technique around the time, it was in the public domain as our legal eagles might say. In fact, so was the use of Iodine to detect secret writing and used to to an extent that totally surprised me. The image earlier in this post describes the US Censors work in examining letters and postal items for secret messages. In the example they were using chemicals to highlight their findings not just UV light.

The point and how it relates to the Somerton Man case is this. The use of both miniature writing and iodine were widely known techniques. It would not be hard to accept that the US and Australian agencies cooperated in this field even before the 2nd World War, it was peacetime in 1936. How much more would they have cooperated in 1948 at the outset of the Cold War?

The SA Police would have been well aware of these techniques especially having just been through WW2.

This newspaper article and the earlier posts covering the way the case was investigated really do support the view that there was very probably some kind of cover up happening in the Somerton Man case. The Police must have known of the techniques, they would have examined the Omar book thoroughly, they knew how it was done, and would have found what has been found since, miniature writing. The larger 'letters' of the code were not real, they were a feint to make others think that they weren't on the track.

What appears on the 'code' page is a series of indentations and markings picked up by the use of Iodine, some of those markings were 'joined' by the Police for whatever reason. An actual copy of the code page is below, you are very welcome to download it and examine it for yourself. Remember that the 'letters' were put there by the Police.

Examine it carefully, you are looking for miniature letters and numbers that vary in size between .2mm and .4mm in height, some are in the open spaces between and around the 'letters' of the code and some are actually found beneath the markings made by the Police.




Somerton Man: He May Have Died on 30th November But When Was He Poisoned?

$
0
0
It's an intriguing question. From the outset it does seem that everyone, myself included, simply assumed that the Somerton Man had been poisoned during his short stay in Adelaide.

But what if that wasn't the case? What if he had in fact been poisoned before he arrived in Adelaide on that train? There is reason to think that this may well have been the case.

Let me relate to you how this option came about. It was a discussion regarding an aspect of the Autopsy, in the report mention is made of the enlarged spleen, almost 3 times its proper size and it also spoke of how other organs were engorged. It was these issues that caused Cleland to reach the conclusion that SM had been poisoned and that he thought it was Digitalis.

One of the particpants in the discussion on this matter made mention of the fact that it can take 3 days and more for a spleen to reach the size that SMSs had. Consider that very carefully, the enlarged spleen was associated with digitalis poisoning and the Somerton Man was found to have died around Midnight on the 30th November, if this is true then he had been poisoned between 1 and 3 days before he arrived in Adelaide.

The question is this, would a man carefully pack his bags and hop on a train to Adelaide and then on the way decide to take his own life? It doesn't seem likely, especially when you add to this the information on the likelihood of a male of SMs age ending his life with Poison which calculated out as more than 150000 to 1.

For me this information now makes it all but 100% positive that the Somerton Man did not take his own life and that he was probably poisoned sometime before he arrived in Adelaide.

When you take all of the circumstances into account including the most recent posts made here about the number of incidents were evidence was 'overlooked' and the nature of the code page, the book and the torn piece in his pocket, the balance of probability is clear, the man was murdered and he was involved in Espionage.

Somerton Man. Was it a Cover Up From Day One?

$
0
0
A big question. Was the whole Tamam Shud Case a cover up right from day one?

The question is prompted by a recently released Trove News article dated December 1st. 1948, that date should ring a bell, it was of course the day that his body was found on Somerton Beach. To be precise he was found around 6 in the morning and this News item was posted in the Adelaide News, an evening newspaper which I think came out at around 4 p.m.

In a busy Police Station, the sequence of events would have been something like this:

1. 6 a.m. body found and inspected for any obvious signs of violence or unusual marks
2. Transport arranged and body taken to the morgue
3. Body again inspected for any wounds or marks cleaned up and prepared for an autopsy, a Police Officer sometimes known as a 'Coroners Officer' would have had control of that process and may even have organised or carried out the washing.
4. A detailed description of the body would have been taken by the Coroners Officer and that would have formed part of an initial 'sudden death' report.
5. A duty, uniformed, inspector would have authorised the release of the mans description to the press
6. The News Police reporter at the time would have made what was probably a regular daily phone call when he came on duty sometime around midday on the 1st December.
7. The press article, based on the Coroners Officer's information would have been prepared for publication.

Worth bearing in  mind that at this stage there was no hint of poisoning or Codes or the Tamam Shud torn piece.

As you will read via the link below, is that the Coroners Officers description of the man was as follows:

Height 5ft 11 inches, quite precise
Build, Well built, again a reasonable description
Hair colour, Fair, quite definite
Eyes, Hazel and again quite definite.

http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/129897161

The problem is that subsequent descriptions of the Somerton Man were quite different, in those he has been described as having auburn hair and blue eyes.

Does the picture below look like his hair is fair?



Remember that in a recent post the Police announced that a 'Reconstructed photograph was available for inspection' that very weekend following the finding of his body.

This image is the one posted earlier that showed clearly that his photograph was manipulated:


When you examine this image carefully it could well be that the face of the man in this image is not that of the Somerton Man, if it's true in this case then it could also be true of the full face image shown here:




Two of our followers, photographers, agreed that it was likely that one or both had been altered, I checked that with other photographers and they agreed. The question is why would you go to these lengths, and it was a tricky process in those days, to alter a photograph?

So here we have it, the first description that was released, one which would have been written by the Coroners Officer who would have been an experienced man to hold that position, described the man as having fair hair an Hazel eyes. The man in this altered image does not have have anything like fair hair as far as I can see.

Did the December 1st Press release about the discover of the mans body on Somerton Beach slip through the 'net' and is that why the Police hurriedly announced the availability of 'reconstructed' images? Why did his description change so quickly after the first press release?

Add to this, the 14 instances of fingerprints not being taken from the mans possessions, the laundry marks that were supposedly traced to Victoria but never followed up, the evidence, in terms of his clothing, possessions and the book, being destroyed despite it still being an open case and I would say there is genuine cause to think that something was sadly amiss at the least and that it was a deliberate cover up at its worst.













Somerton Man. Some astonishing facts..

$
0
0
The Code Page Re-Visited


In this article I have brought together 17 facts about the 'code' page, some of which are quote well known and others for want of a better term are really quite astonishing. You will read how neither the book nor the code page were fingerprinted, amazing! Then read how the Police sent just a photograph of the Code page to Naval Intelligence in Melbourne. Amazing!

But there is something else that is even more astonishing, read through and at the end of this piece all will be revealed..


  1. The copy of the Rubaiyat was published by Whitcomb & Tombs, New Zealand and was from the ‘Courage & Friendship’ series printed first in 1944. 
  2. The book was white in colour, to all accounts the series was printed in a range of ‘pastel’ colours but not in white.The size of the book was approximately 110mm by 140 mm, a pocket version.
  3. When found, the book had two noticeable issues, firstly the final phrase ‘Tamam Shud’ had apparently been torn out of the book. Secondly the back page of the book had been torn off.
  4. The ‘Code’ was found on the back of the last page in the book by SA Police or others when they used first a UV light to examine it and found what appeared to be indentations or marks on the surface and then used a second process, believed to be Iodine Vapour to reveal the markings in detail.
  5. The Police or some other organisation created photographs of the treated page. The ‘letters’ of the code that we see today are the results of someone tracing over the markings that they saw on the page.
  6. In all there were 5 lines of ‘letters’ and 50 ‘letters’ shown in the image of the page, the second line often referred to as the ‘Crossed out’ line may not have been crossed out. There are numerous lines across the book and it is impossible to tell whether the line, in fact 4 separate short lines when viewed under magnification, was in place before the ‘letters’
  7. The two crossed lines near the centre of the page have been stopped short. Under magnification the lines appear to continue and then meet together at a point closer to the edge of the image. Where they meet it is possible to see a second ‘X’ across the point where they join. 
  8. Using various techniques, it is possible to see some 17 different symbols, number sets and words at various locations within the ‘code’ page outside of the marked ‘letters’ with each ‘letter’ containing numerous and unexplained markings when viewed under magnification.
  9. Three examples that can be seen faintly with the naked eye are:The word 2YRS and 1942 appear just below and to the right of the first letter ‘S’ in the last line followed by the word Venom then the letter X and 4 digits visible under magnification. Alongside the top of the first letter ‘A’ in line 1, there are 4 digits. A third example that lies within the bounds of a letter but still visible is to be found at the top of the first letter ‘B’ in the fourth line, here you will see 4 digits with more visible within that letter under magnification.
  10. Detective Brown in recent years still believed that the torn piece ‘Tamam Shud’ was in fact the same shape and size of the area torn from the book as in the images shown on numerous websites. This conflicts with the image that appeared in the Advertiser when the book was found and the images published showing a larger torn out area
  11. Experiments have shown that a piece of paper similar in shape and size to the torn piece that was found can be torn from a page in one piece.
  12. Detective Brown also believes that the ‘Code’ itself appeared in the top left quadrant of the back page of the book with the telephone numbers appearing in the adjacent quadrant. That would make the size of the 'code' page just 55mm X 70mm
  13. None of the pages of this book were fingerprinted
  14. The torn piece was not fingerprinted or treated in any way
  15. A scientist at the time suggested that the paper types of the torn piece and the paper found in the book were similar The torn piece still exists today.
  16. Under magnification, there are numerous unexplained markings on a high resolution image of the torn piece.
  17. According to the SA Police they only sent the photograph of the code page to Naval Intelligence in Melbourne and not the original book.

After all of these facts and in the light of the technology that was available, and indeed used by SA Police on previous occasions, no fingerprints were taken from the book in fact no fingerprints from anywhere except from one place, from the hands of the Somerton Man. That's astonishing in itself but what is even more astonishing is that the Coroner never asked the question as to whether fingerprints had been taken.

Bring it all right up to date it would seem that this amazing lapse has been continued on, there are some very intelligent people who have been engaged in attempting to solve the case for many years and not one of them asked that question either. Food for thought?


Somerton Man: What the larger letters of the code mean, EUREKA?

$
0
0

Does a WW2 Radio Manual Hold The Answer?




The recent posts have focused once again on the presence of micro writing hidden beneath the larger letters found on the 'code' page. These posts contained numerous images that clearly show micro writing is present in each of the larger letters and in fact is also present beneath the lines across the page. For the record, this was the first time where such a use of micro writing has been discovered, to my knowledge no one has found an example before, at least publicly.

Back to the lines! One of those lines was always considered to indicate that whoever wrote the letters down had made a mistake and had simply crossed out the line. No explanation was given for the two lines with an X at one end that sits around the centre of the page although it was part of a recognised symbol used by radio operators to indicate a separation point between messages; the full symbol is two joined lines with X at each end where they crossed over.

The Clue
This provided a clue to the code page and the large letter meanings, what if all we see on the code page in terms of large letters were radio operators 'Pro Signs' short codes for a number of elements of all radio messages?

Strange M's & The Letter V
Looking at the 'code page' the first thing that may strike you is the use of the letter M on each of the first 4 lines of the code. You should notice how they are different styles, the first and third Ms are quite stylised, unusual in form whilst the second and fourth Ms are what you could call standard in form.

As you will read, it now appears possible that the first stylised M followed by an R could mean that this was a message received by the holder of the book. The second, standard shaped M, could indicate that this line was transmitted by the holder. The same theory applies to the Ms in the third and fourth lines, receiver then sender. Of course, this is a first attempt at understanding the nature of the M's and more needs to be done to either confirm it or consider alternatives.

The first letter in the last line is a letter V. Again as you will read, the V is the from line, this would indicate who sent it. That would be interesting to know, indeed it all will be.

We know that each of these letters contained micro letters and numbers and it now looks like we know at least the purpose behind each of the 5 lines. The next step is to further clean up the indiviual micro code letters and numbers within each of the larger letters, now perhaps we're getting somewhere.

A Eureka Moment..
A US radio field manual from WW2 may provide some more answers.
(View this manual here. When you read it, the first page describes how this version supersedes earlier ones, the search is on for copies of these, they could provide even more insight. Let us know if you find copies.)

Within the manual we find the following 'Pro Signs':
A means 'The originator of this message is indicated by the call sign immediately following'
AB in a sequence means 'All Before'
B means 'More to follow'
C means 'Correct' or, 'The following is the correct version'
D means 'Deferred'
G means 'Repeat back'
N means 'Not received'
O means 'Urgent'
P means 'Priority'
R means 'Received'
T means 'Transmit to..'
V means 'From'

If the last two letters of the code are not AB but AR then that would mean 'This is the end of my transmission to you and no response is required or expected'

What this may mean within the context of the 'code page' is not exactly clear at this time but it does seem possible that the larger letter may have direct relevance to the smaller micro contents of that letter. For example the letter 'C' at the end of line 4 could be saying 'the micro code contents of this letter is the correct version' and another example could be the letter 'P', which occurs twice in line 3, could mean, 'the micro code in this letter is a priority'.

Stay tuned! There's much more to follow and you read it here first!

To borrow a phrase, what we have found here is not the cure, but it does show us symptoms not seen recognised before, they were hidden in plain sight.

Coming soon, 'How the 'code' was 'Transmitted' not how you may be thinking..



Somerton Man: Intelligence Backdrop

$
0
0



Australian Prime Minister, Ben Chifley,
Launches Holden Car, Adelaide November 29th.1948.

Recently I came across a most interesting document, it was a summary of steps taken by the Australian Government to stem the flow of secret information from various Government Departments. See below.

Whilst there are many interesting facts within the document what struck me was the entry dated December 23rd. 1948. It details a directive from Ben Chifley the then Prime Minister of Australia sent to all Departments, involved with Defence activities, for action.

This was not the norm. In fact in this record, it is the only case where the Prime Minister took such an action. What was it that caused him to do that in December 1948? You would have to think that he had been briefed either by Australian, British or US based Intelligence services. A search of Australian newspapers from mid November to mid December shows nothing out of the ordinary related to Defencematters apart that is from the visit of high ranking UK Military officers to South Australia on November 17th, Ben Chifley launching a new car at Holdens on November 29th and  the discovery of the body of a man on Somerton Beach on December 1st. 1948 and to whom a book, with what appeared to be code written in to it, was linked.


Here's the link where you can find the document:
https://www.dfat.gov.au/publications/historical/volume-16/historical-document-16-369.html

And here's a copy:







369 Brief on Security by Department of

Defence

Report[April 1949][1],
TOP SECRET

Report[April 1949][1],
TOP SECRET
BRIEF ON ASPECTS OF SECURITY IN AUSTRALIA [matter omitted]
MEASURES TAKEN TO STRENGTHEN SECURITY 16. The following is a summary of the more important recommendations of, or action taken by the Defence Department over a number of years to strengthen security in Australia with special reference to the security of Defence information and activities:-
[matter omitted][2]
(b) Decision to create new National Security Organization On 2nd March, 1949, the Prime Minister announced the formation of a new Security Service under the direction of Mr. Justice Reed.[3] Its functions will be (i) Investigation of subversive organizations.
(ii) Counter espionage.
(iii) Preventative security, which includes measures to protect secrets and the security checking of personnel who handle secrets.
(c) Long Range Weapons Board – Security Organization Executive control of the Long Range Weapons Project in Australia is vested in the Long Range Weapons Board (Australia), administered by the Department of Supply and Development. A special security organization was set up in 1947 to cover the project. The general direction is vested in a Security Committee of which the three Service Directors of Intelligence and the Director of the Commonwealth Investigation Branch are members. Certain Service personnel, Peace Officers, and members of the Commonwealth Investigation Branch are seconded for special duty to this section which has its own Executive Officer. Copy of the security plan approved for the project, together with a recent report on its implementation, is separate. It is understood that at the present time some 20 operatives are employed full time on security duties in this organization. It has representatives at the various installations both governmental and commercial, concerned with various aspects of the project. A general measure of co-ordination with Defence is achieved by virtue of the fact that the Service Directors of Intelligence are members both of the Long Range Security Committee and the Joint Intelligence Committee, part of the Higher Defence Machinery under the Defence Department.
(d) Security checking of Officials In June, 1948, the Defence Department recommended the security checking of all officers, Service or civilian, who handle classified Defence information, and, as opportunity offers, all members of the Services and all civilian officers of Service and associated Departments.
On 23rd December, 1948, the Prime Minister directed the Ministerial Heads of all Departments concerned in any way with the security of Defence information (i.e. the Commonwealth Treasurer, the Ministers for External Affairs, Supply and Development, Defence, Navy, Army and Air, the Minister-in-Charge of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research) that action is to be taken ‘to have all officers, Service or civilian, who handle Defence information and documents of secret and top secret information, security checked by the Commonwealth Investigation Service of the Attorney-General’s Department. As opportunity offers, all members of the Services and all civilian officers of the Service and associated Departments should be checked’. Action is now proceeding.
Where persons of doubtful loyalty are discovered as a result of this check, they will be transferred to other work within the Department concerned where access to classified information is not possible, or, if necessary, they will be transferred to other Departments where there will be no security risk involved.
(e) Recommendations of Inter-Departmental Committee of 5th August, 1948 On this date a conference was held between the Defence Committee and senior officials representing Departments concerned with the security of Defence information. The following recommendations were made and were transmitted to the Ministers concerned by the Minister for Defence:-
(i) The security checking by the Commonwealth Investigation Service of all officers, Service or civilian, who handle Defence information or documents of secret or higher classification.
(ii) Each Department concerned to give consideration to its internal security measures for the security of information and important documents relating to Defence.
(iii) Consideration should be given to the security of buildings in which documents containing Defence information of secret and higher classification are kept.
(iv) Consideration should be given to the appointment of a full-time or part-time Security Officer, as the case may require, to ensure co-ordination and policing of security measures within Departments and to effect the necessary liaison of the Commonwealth Investigation Service.
Recommendation (i) is the subject of sub-paragraph (d) above. All Ministers concerned have agreed to accept and implement the remaining recommendations.
(f) Security Legislation Since 1923, successive Governments have had before them the question of improved legislation relating to security. The existing legislation (see paragraph 9) is based on the British Official Secrets Act of 1911. This Act was brought up to date and considerably strengthened in the United Kingdom by the Official Secrets Act 1920, the adoption of which was desired in Australia. Though on several occasions legislation has been drafted and introduced into the Commonwealth Parliament, political difficulties have so far prevented the passage of legislation. With the lessons of the recent war in mind, a Defence Security Act has been drafted and submitted by this Department to the Council of Defence for approval.
The Bill is at present under consideration by a Cabinet Committee comprising the Prime Minister, the Minister for Defence, and the Attorney-General.
(g) Security Instructions A comprehensive instruction for use throughout Commonwealth Government Departments entitled ‘Security of Official Documents and Information’ was drafted by the Joint Intelligence Committee, and after examination and approval of an inter-departmental Committee, has been promulgated as an Instruction by the Prime Minister. The Prime Minister has added a foreword to the booklet drawing attention to the importance of the subject matter. This Instruction deals with the classification of official documents, custody, circulation and transmission of classified documents, and miscellaneous matters concerned with departmental security of documents and information (copy attached as Appendix ‘E’).
(h) Security of Victoria Barracks Victoria Barracks, Melbourne, houses the Departments of Defence, Navy, Army and Air, and the Defence Division of the Treasury. The Headquarters of the three Services are also located in the area. On the recommendation of the Defence Committee, comprehensive measures have been approved by the Minister for the physical security of the Barracks Area, including re-introduction of a system of passes and supervision of visitors. Action is now being taken to implement these measures.
(i) Internal Security Measures, Department of Defence Consequent upon the recommendations referred to in sub-paragraph (e) above, an officer of the rank of Lieutenant-Commander has been seconded by the Navy to the Department of Defence to act as Security Officer. His duties will include executive action in implementing the approved scheme for the security of Victoria Barracks Area (see sub-paragraph (h) above), and to make recommendations as to, and to co-ordinate and supervise security measures within the Department.
Consequent upon an external examination made early in 1948 as to the system for the control and custody of classified documents within the Department of Defence, a ‘Central Distribution Section’ has been set up in the Department, the purpose of which is to provide the maximum security for special documents including classified documents of overseas origin, by the central control of their receipt, circulation and custody.[4]
[1] The document is undated.
[2] The omitted material comprises a review of steps taken since 1938.
[3] By Government decision one line has been expunged here.
[4] The brief was supplemented by three progress reports which Shedden sent to Gray on, respectively, 30 June (see Document 374), 20 July and 6 September 1949.
[AA : A5954, 1677/2]

Somerton Man: EUREKA Part 2 - Code Page Unlocked

$
0
0
CODE PAGE UNLOCKED
Morse Code Pro Signs Identified


In a very recent post we discussed the possibility that the 'Code' page letters were in fact morse code Pro signs as found in a US Military Radio Operators manual. Further we suggested that each larger 'letter' acted as a carrier for the smaller, micro written, letters and numbers found in every 'letter' on the page. Above is an image of the full code page marked up showing the first letters in each line and the last letters with, where found, an interpretation of the Prosign meaning.

Last Letters AB or AR?
Before we get into the discussion on this image, we need first to clarify the nature of the last two 'letters' in the last line on the page, are they AB or are they AR?

In the image below, I have brought together for comparison each of the 4 letters B found on the page:


If you look closely, you'll see that the four 'B's above are fairly similar in shape with reasonably rounded upper and lower parts and importantly with the base of each being 'closed',
In contrast the base of the letter beneath is left open and the curves are quite pronounced.


Now compare these four with the image on the left, it's the last letter on the last line. It comprises of a letter and a 'flourish' beneath that leads off down and under the preceding letter, the letter A.  My view is that the shape of this last letter on the last line is noticeably different to the other 4 examples of the letter B. I have circled where I think the 'flourish' actually starts and raise the question is that a flourish or is it meant to be an underscore? That being the case then the last 2 letters on the last line are in fact AR and NOT AB.
View the Radio Operators Manual here. This manual, FM 24-6, is an official US War Department Publications dated 1945.
Why is that important? Because when we look to our Radio Operators manual and the Pro Sign meaning of AR, it means 'This is the end of my message to you and no reply is required or expected' It is a matter of conjecture as to whether there is anything to be inferred by way of similarity between this meaning and the meaning of the two words 'TAMAM SHUD'

The Main Code Page Image
Returning to the main image at the top of the page and taking this theory further, we can apply the Pro Sign meanings to each of the final letters on each of the lines with the exception of line 2. That could be because the letter I has no Prosign meaning or it could be that it does have one that we have yet to discover.

The other 4 lines do contain final letters that have Prosign meanings:

Line 1, D = Deferred and AB meaning All before
Line 3, P = Priority and T meaning Transmit
Line 4, C = Correct Version
Line 5, V meaning from with call sign to follow, the prosign 'T' meaning Transmit, appears 4 times on the last line, AR = This is the end of my message to you and no reply is reqired or expected,

Other Prosigns from the manual can be applied to the letters as shown in the earlier post on this topic and they can be used to show how the micro written content of each of the larger letters should be treated by the recipient. For example, the letter T indicates that the content of this letter should be transmitted to another recipient. The letter P means that the micro content is a Priority item and so on. I hope you take the time to examine the Prosigns and then apply them to the 'letters' in each line.

You will also notice that I have highlighted each of the first letters in each line on the page. I wanted to show how there is a pattern of use as in the 2 styles of the letter M. A stylised version and then a more plain version which appear alternatively. Lastly the letter V which has a Prosign meaning of 'From'.

THE CODE PAGE HAS BEEN UNLOCKED
I interpret the first 4 introduction letters as being the identifier of the source or type of message, the stylised M lines are from or to one source and the plain M lines are from or to another source.

The last line commencing with the letter V has the meaning of 'From', it is difficult to be precise here but I suggest that the whole page could be about an intercepted set of coded messages that have been copied and converted to micro writing which are then discussed in the last line by the actual sender.

The last line then Starts with a V or 'FROM' and ends with AR which means:

'This is the end of my message to you and no reply is required or expected


Why use Micro writing? Simply because it would be the most effective way of reducing a fairly lengthy message including Prosigns, Call signs and message content into a very small space for ease of concealment and eventual distribution to others.

Next steps are to work through the micro writing, which is the real code, and then get on to the huge task of deciphering the more than 1000 characters that exist.

Your thoughts and ideas are very welcome. I would like to thank those who have emailed me with their input, I very much appreciate their support and recognition that it is difficult to present this new information and facts that others have spent so long on attempting to solve. I would like to think that we all have the same goal in mind, to find out who SM really was, what he was doing and why he died, then we should send him home wherever that may be.

Somerton Man: Eureka Part 3: Code Analysis 1st Cut, the letter C holds the key?

$
0
0
The letter 'C' holds the key! Further evidence that the 'Code Page' is based on the US Military Radio Operators Manual.. (Updated 20/6/14)
(View Manual here)

In the two previous Eureka posts, we discussed the 'unlocking' of the code page thanks to the discovery of a US Military Radio Operators Manual. The manual revealed the existence of 'Prosigns' (particular letters and groups of letters of the alphabet) used in Morse Code by the US Military that reduce the number of morse code key events, the dots and dashes, in a message.

Here's the thing about Morse Code that seemingly has escaped so many Academics, students, serious and amateur code crackers and more..


When you are preparing a message for transmission using Morse Code, you don't write down the dots and dashes, you write down the letters, numbers and/or and Prosigns. Similarly, if you receiving a Morse Code message once again you don't write down the dots and dashes, you write down what the dots and dashes represent in terms of letters, numbers and/or Prosigns. It's the skill of the radio operator that turns the letters and numbers into morse code and of course turns the morse code into letters and numbers.

Before reading further I would ask that you bear in mind that whilst we have a number of larger letters on each line of the 'code' page, each of these letters in my view is a carrier for additional information in the form of much smaller micro written letters and numbers.

At the head of this post is an image of the letter C and also the last two letters in the last line, 'AR' with a flourish just beneath them.

As already discussed the last line of the code begins with a letter 'V' which is a Prosign for 'From and what follows is the call sign of the sender'. The 'AR' prosign means 'this is my last message to you no response is expected or required'All by itself that makes a reasonably compelling case for our position that the Code Page is based on the Radio Operators manual.

The exciting news is that the last letter in line 4 of the code page underlines and corroberates the evidence thus far posted on this subject. The letter 'C' is the Prosign for 'Corrected Version'.

Think back now to line 2, the line that has often been referred to as the 'crossed out' line.  That line also commenced with the same style or 'plain' letter 'M' as does line 4.

The crossed out line 2 was corrected by line 4, a statement made by many but it is only now we have the confirmation by virtue of the last letter of line 4. 'C' Prosign for 'Corrected version'

The significance of the 5th and bottom line is that it gives us further corroberation to the claim that the Code Page is indeed based on the US Military Radio Operators Manual dated 1945.

Code Page Implications
What does that mean to the code page? Well, looking at the page we found that there were indeed Prosigns in the lines of letters found there.

I must make it clear at this stage that I am not a cipher expert, my skills if any relate to the ability to find where codes may be hidden. What follows is my first step analysis of the code page making use of the new found Prosigns and as you will see, there are some intriguing aspects of the analysis that I hope others with greater skills than I, will take up.

In the earlier posts we recognised that each line with the exception of the last line used one of two forms of the letter M which was in fact the first letter on each of the first 4 lines. For our purposes we called the letter M on line 1 and Line 3 style 1. Then on lines 2 and 4 we called the letter M found there style 2.

My view is that these first letters M identify each line of subsequent letters as either from a particular source, to a particular recipient and/or identifies the line as a particular kind of message.

Line 1. First Cut

The letters on the code page first line are as you have already seen:

M R G O A B A B D.

Below is the first cut of an analysis of what this line contains, bear in mind that this is a work in progress and I fully expect to review and update this cut:

M defines the source, recipient or type of message
R  means 'Routine' which that no urgency is attached to this part of the message
G O A B represent 4 letters from a code of some form (see below)
AB is the Prosign meaning 'All Before'
D is the Prosign meaning 'Deferred'

The above structure, with the exception of the first letter 'M', came from the US War Department Radio Operators Manual.

For our purpose the first cut, our first line now looks like:
M    R  GOAB    AB    D

The letters GOAB would be the coded letters for line 1 with the letter 'R' by itself indicating that what follows is 'Routine' according to our list of 'Prosigns'. The letter 'D' at the end of the line means that there is no urgency to this message, it can wait for the next shift.

Stay tuned for more but please bear in mind we have more work to do and the current findings may be adjusted as we move ahead.


Somerton Man: Photo Realistic Image Progress

$
0
0



A little while ago I embarked on a project to create a photorealistic image of the Somerton Man based upon all known images that existed of him. This included the standard full face, profile and images of the plaster bust plus another image that was taken immediately before he was to be buried and after he had been embalmed.

The image above represents the progress made to date, there are still a few tweaks needed, the colour of the hair is actually quite challenging and it needs to be a little darker as per the Police description. A little more skin tone and we will be there.

Thanks to Professor Derek Abbot and others for their input in the process, please note the mole.

Any comments would be very welcome.

Somerton Man: Sofia to London, The Bulgarian Connection

$
0
0

An overnight flight from Sofia to London and from there onto Australia?


Flight route Sofia to London
TABSO Airline Pamphlet. Li2 Aircraft, 1950

           LZ1556                      

LZ 1556 Location beneath AR
 The image to the left was found just beneath the AR sequence at the end of the final line on the code page. It has a height of approximately .4 mm so it is quite small.

It is quite a definite string of letters and numbers and so began the research into just what that would have come from.





LZ 1556 Close up
To researchers of early 20th Century history, would recognise the LZ almost immediately, these were the two letters used to indicate the Zeppelin rigid airship. However the numbers that followed the LZ prefix only went as high as 21 so I believe our LZ 1556 would not refer to this marvel, thankfully I might add.

Somerton Man: Bulgarian Connection?

Nonetheless it was a lead of sorts so the aircraft theme was pursued and it was found that LZ was a call sign for aircraft registered in Bulgaria. However the 1556 was proving to be a challenge. Fortunately a Bulgarian researcher and investigatve journalist, Olga Dimitrova, was able to help. The answer was that LZ1556 was in fact an IATA flight number and it related to flights between Sofia and London. This information was really welcome even though it still left a few questions. To learn more it was necessary to go back into the history of Bulgarian Air travel and what a history it turned out to be. You are not about to be burdened with the full details so what follows is a summary of the essential points.


JU52 At Manchester Ringway Airport 1947, BEA Flight.
As of 29th June 1947 when Bulgarian Air Lines was formed, flights within Bulgaria were made on ex German JU 52 Tri Motor aircraft. In late 1947, The Russian Army/Airforce, liked what they saw of the fledgling industry and bought into the Airline which was renamed TABSO (Transportno-aviacionno balgaro-savetsko obedinenie) at that time the airline was a Soviet/Bulgarian owned venture. TABSO then purchased Lusinov Li 2 aircraft,  a Russian version of the American DC3 (Dakota). The reason for this move was whilst the JU 52 was a reliable workhorse for passengers and transport, having a range of just 620 miles or so, it was not suitable for the lucrative, longer distance routes such as to London which was a distance of 1550 miles. The Li2 had a range of 1500 miles meaning that a single stopover for refuelling would make the trip.
Lusinov L1 2. This image was taken at Moscow Airport
Of note here is that the long range version of the L1 2 was equipped to carry just 14 passengers, the short range version carried 28.

Summary & Some Questions

In regards to the Somerton Man case what we have on the code page is an IATA issued flight number which could only have been issued after late 1947, for a flight from Sofia to London on an aircraft that could carry just 14 pasengers. Could this have been a flight taken by the Somerton Man? There can be no certainty about that at this stage but is is a possibility and one we would not have known about without first finding this example of micro writing. If this was him, a search of passenger arrivals from Sofia during period from late 47 to October 1948, could give us a name and possibly a photograph. It is believed that there were only 3 or 4 such services a week and with only 14 passengers at a time the task whilst a reasonable size would not be a daunting one. If the flight was not taken by the Somerton Man, then who was on that aircraft whose Flight number was found on the 'code' page?

Note:
1. Whilst aircraft registered to Bulgaria had the LZ prefix, ticketing via IATA only commenced following the commencement of  TABSO operations in late 1947, this included the allocation of flight numbers.
2. Airlines can and do alter flight numbers and swap them across routes, it is possible that LZ 1556 in 1948 terms could have been to a different location although TABSO seemed to be consistent with their numbering.

Somerton Man: Micro Writen Code Examples

$
0
0

MICRO LETTERS/NUMBERS EXAMPLES

Read more on this story and more in the Adelaide Advertiser

Following up on the recent posts on Prosigns and Micro written codes, here are 3 examples of letters containing micro code. At this time there is no proof that the Somerton Man wrote the various coded messages only that he had a torn piece of paper which matched the same type of paper found in the book and the same phrase, TAMAM SHUD on the torn piece, was missing from that book.

The letters concerned are A and Q from the fourth line, and S from the fifth and final line. Work on other letters is well advanced and they will be released as soon as they reach a reasonably viewable state.

For the record, the process used to reveal these hidden letters and numbers is colour replacement. What that means we are able to remove lighter shades of grey from the larger letters leaving the darker coloured numbers and letters in view.







If you are able to make any headway on interpreting what you see here we would be delighted to hear your views.

SOMERTON MAN: The Piece in the Puzzle. Linking Alf, Jestyn & the Somerton Man

$
0
0

Firstly a Welcome to News Limited readers and all other visitors, thanks for calling by. In this blog you will see a collection of many images and other information related to the Somerton Man case as well as information on Espionage and related equipment and techniques.

VERSE 70 Line 3, Word 2.
Much of our work is devoted to Micro writing or Microcalligraphy as it is possibly better known. The technique goes back thousands of years but in WW2 and earlier it was used extensively as a mathod of 'Secret Writing' and you can read more about that in this CIA released document.


Being as small as .35mm in height, this writing is very difficult to find and sometimes if the document on which it is written is old before the image was taken, it becomes more difficult to view. In the example from Verse 70 of the RUbaiyat given to Alf Boxall by the nurse, Jestyn, the image was taken when the document was more than 30 years old so it is a little hard to discern bt nonetheless still visible.

If you're familiar with the case, on seeing these images you'll realise that the person who wrote in such small letters and numbers in this verse could well be the same person who wrote the main 'Code' page.



Before starting this post, over the years many things have been said about 'Jestyn' that have been the source of great pain for her family. Adding to the problem was the fact that most of it was totally unfounded and done by those in pursuit of recognition of one form or another. In taking that approach, they effectively reduced a serious event for all involved to the level of a soap opera, that's unforgiveable. Whatever is written here on this blog with regards to Jestyn or any other persons mentioned is done with the greatest of respect, in fact in my view Jestyn's family has a great deal to
be proud of.

For some time it has been suggested on this blog that there was a link between Alf Boxall, Jestyn and the Somerton Man. We've also focused continually on the 'code' page and revealed the presence of micro writing within the larger letters found on the code page. The images above iare taken from the Verse 70 quatrain that Jestyn wrote in a copy of the Rubaiyat and gave it to Alf Boxall.




This now links Alf, Jestyn and the 'code' page found and associated with the Somerton Man. Can it really be coincidence that micro writing or micro code is found in both this verse 70 and the 'code' page?



I believe that Jestyn was being trained by Alf Boxall in tradecraft techniques and this image corroborates evidence of the existence of micro wiritng in both documents and that there is a definite link between them.

This was taken from a high resolution TIF file, no artifacts and no pareidolia, just Tradecraft well executed and sufficient to decieve all for the past 60 + years. Should anyone have definite proof of the presence of artifacts and they can produce images that present in exactly this way it would be appreciated if you can show them to all who have an interest in this case. It isn't sufficient to make statements without backing them up with evidence by way of images.

View earlier post on this topic here

SOMERTON MAN: Verse 70, More images of micro code and analysis

$
0
0

New Image Added 5th July 2014
The last post was about the inscription of Verse 70 made by Jestyn and handed to Alf Boxall. The writing in the inscription contained micro code and images were posted. this inscription was again a Fitzgerald translation of the Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam, published by the Australasian Publishing Company.

This post continues on with more images from the inscription and an added image which shows something that appears to me to be most unusual, an alignment of specific letter types, ones with upstrokes.

Let's look at the analysis image of the full inscription:



My reason for examining this inscription, apart from looking for the evidence of micro codes now found, was that I was puzzled by the space between the words in the first line and then looking further, word spacing seemed odd throughout the piece. It was only when i had found the micro writing within most of the letters that contained forward slanting upstrokes that it occured to me that they were all pretty much aligned diagonally as you see above. I think it possible that this was done as a way to present code blocks. For example the first downward  diagonal on the left of the image aligns the last letter d in indeed with the letter d in and and then the letter Y in my. It could be that you are meant to read the code in each of those 3 letters from bottom to top. Any ideas or thoughts are very welcome.

There is another aspect that is a puzzle. If you look to the first line and slightly down but between the last d in indeed and the letter R in repentance, you will see what appears to be a full stop but it's in the middle of nowhere, there is one above the word spring in line 3 which would probably be the dot for the letter i and then there is a full stop after 'tore' the last letter iin line 4. What's odd is that they are completely aligned diagonally and if you join them up they disect the diagonal downlines at 90 degrees. Coincidence?

Now, about the letter R, those who are familiar with the case will also be familiar with the main code page. There are two Letters R on that page. I would draw your attention to first R which is the second letter in line 1. You should see a striking similarity in the shape of both. I'll post a comparison image of that today.

One last point regarding this copy of the book, I have been fortunate enough to acquire an exact copy of the book and have also been sent a full scan of another simialr book, When all three are compared, the paper in the Boxall book is quite different in its appearance and texture. Again I do not offer any explanation for this but it seemed to be quite unusual. Something that needs more investigation.

Here are some more close up images from this inscription, the mcro code is very fine and and very small, you will need to look carefully to make them out:

The left hand image shows the word 'the' with pronounced cross bar on the T which shows a string of letters and numbers, very neat example, it would seem that more than one person could have been involved in putting the micro code in place, a team effort perhaps?
Above you will see the upright of the letter 't' from the word 'then' in line 3. You will notice the odd placement of the cross bar being removed to the right and over the E.




A number of examples of microcode in the image on the right, more work to be done to lift these so that they are more readily visible, it may take a little time but the work will be worth it.
The left hand image shows the upright section of the letter t in 'Repentance'. It contains letters and numbers but it is a work in progress with more being done to reveal more information.

On the right is the word 'spring' from line 3 of the verse, the upright contains micro code, you should be able to make out the X starting point on the left of the upright section of the letter P and then a string of numbers and letters follow with 5242 then XN9085, after that it is less clear. Click on the image and it should present in another, larger, window.






So everyone's aware, when I examine these close up images, in order to make the micro codes more visible I use a photo editing tool, Paint.net, and then select the colour replacement tool. In this way I can 'scrub' over a selected colour and change it to another, more viewable colour. The shape and form of the microcode letters is not affected, purely the colours. Hence they will appear to be a much darker shade.

SOMERTON MAN: Did Jestyn Write The Code page? The R's may have the answer..

$
0
0

This is a comparison image of the letter R from two documents from the Tamam Shud case, both from copies of the Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam:

On the left is the letter R from Jestyn's Inscription, in cursive, in the book she gave to Alf Boxall
and on the right is the letter R, in Capitals, found on the Somerton Man Code Page.

As you can see there is quite a strong resemblance between these two letters. Is it sufficient though to say they were written by the same person?

On the first glance it does seem to be a fair conclusion but we have to consider that the image on the left is handwritten in cursive style whilst on the right, the letter was a stand alone capital letter traced over by the Police. You could argue that the tracing looks to have been patiently and faithfully done and the overall shape of the R is almost identical with one notable difference in the image on the left,  the shape of the curve down and away from the central up stroke towards the letter 'e' in 'Repentance' is neatly curved. Would that be because the 'R' in the inscription is in cursive style whilst the R on the right from the Code page is a stand alone capitalised shape?

Looking closer at the R from the code page you can just about make out the outlines of the smaller letters/numbers of the micro code as the Police attempted to capture every individual character, a difficult job at best and whilst there are at least two other letters that show the same detailed approach, the first letter M in line 2 and the letter V in line 5, it does seem that in this process they changed their tack and all other letters were copied with individual strokes of the writing instrument as opposed to the almost 'stippled' appearance of the three letters R, M and V.

Handwriting analysis and comparison is not an exact science and thus you would need to exercise a fair degree of caution in arriving at a conclusion that said both letter shapes were originally made by the same person. Nonetheless, it is a most interesting comparison image and may yet play a part in the final answer.




SOMERTON MAN: Professor Abbott's image of micro written code from Jestyn's inscription

$
0
0

Are these micro letters and numbers and if they are, 

who put them there and when?











You will see in the left image, quite faint but still viewable, what appear to be a set of letters and numbers, microcode. In the right image I used the color change tool to bring out the actual shapes of the letters and numbers so that they are clearer. Note in particular how the outer edge of the upright section of the 'd' has been used as a guideline for the set of letters and numbers. The numbers and letters do not fill the space between the outer and inner edges of the upright stroke. This is something that anyone can test out and if you would like copies of any of the images on this blog then please contact me.

This image is taken from a 'High Definition' video clip recorded by Professor Abbott and circulated, it seemed to me to be inconsistent that a video should be used as he had already stated to me that video clips were not reliable. When I raised that as an issue his response was that this was different because it was in high definiton. So, taking him at his word, the above is one of a number of stills taken from that video. I should point out that the video was taken relatively recently, within the last two years, whilst the images I posted in the past week were from an earlier scan which was provided by Professor Abbott.. This earlier image was from a 300dpi black/white Tiff file for those technically inclined.

As some will know, Professor Abbott has made numeorus comments in the press of late in the most recent of which he pblicly declared that he was highly skeptical of the notion of micro written code in the Somerton Man code page. He went on to suggest that even if it was there it would have to be proven that it contained something of relevance to the case. I am honestly not sure what he meant by that particular comment, from where I sit, anything we find, be it on the SM code page, Jestyn's inscription or any other item from the case, needs to be investigated and not simply dismissed out of hand.

I will be publishing more images and notes later this week time permitting.

For the record I have known Professor Abbott for many years and I admire and respect his academic achievements greatly. He is, I am sure, a good man and I do not doubt his integrity but as stated I am uncertain as to why he made the statements to the press that he did just last week.

SOMERTON MAN: Absolute Proof of The Presence of Micro Writing? The Truth, So Simple...

$
0
0

THE REAL TRUTH IS..

So Simple and Yet We All Missed It...

Letter S Last Line Showing Micro Writing


Letters T & G Showing Micro Writing Quite Legible
A, Q and C Sequence in Line 4 of the Code page Showing Micro Letters and Numbers..

HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT, THE TRUTH WAS STARING US ALL IN THE FACE FOR 
66 YEARS...

All the small markings you can see within the larger letters above are micro letters and numbers and they were placed within larger outline letters using those letters as carriers.

For so many years, 66 years now in fact, everyone, and I do mean everyone with myself included, overlooked the obvious. The obvious things being the similarity of the letter R in both the code page and Jestyn's Verse 70 Inscription made in the copy of the Rubaiyat handed over to Alf Boxall at the Clifton Gardens Hotel. Next, the fact that the last letter in the last line of the code page was not a B but an R making the last two letters of the code now AR and not AB. That in turn matches the AR Prosign code from a US Military Radio Operators Manual which means 'This is my last message to you, no reply is expected or required'. The latter is corroborated by the presence of the letter V at the beginning of the last line with the Prosgn V meaning 'From' And finally the presence of Micro Written Letters and Numbers in both Jestyns Inscription and the Somerton Man Code Page.

THE TRUTH ?
So Simple and Yet We All Mised It..

1. When the Police received the book, the back page was missing, it had been torn off.

2. That left the next inner fly leaf page that was examined under UV light and it was that examination that revealed indentations. Indentations under UV Light show up as white.

3. The Police photographed  the page whilst it was under UV light which would have shown a bluish tinge across the page and the white indentations all lined up.

4. In order to enhance the appearance of the white indentations, they produced a negative, this means that the bluish tinge would turn a light to mid grey just like the code page and the white indentations would turn to black. In fact given the statement in the next point, they may have found two shades of colouring within the indentations.
5. THE CLINCHER is this, now that we have a negative image which shows the indentations as being black and they made the shape of letters, it is also very possible that larger letters were drawn by the author of the page to act as a guide for the smaller, micro letters and numbers.

WHY WOULD YOU NEED TO MARK OVER THEM WITH A FELT TIP PEN?

The answer of course is that you wouldn't, the only reason the Police would need to mark over the negative markings on the image would be that they were covering over the many smaller micro written letters and numbers. They would have liked the public to give feedback and what these marked over letters might mean but they certainly didn't want to tip off others or show that micro writing had been found.

That's it in a nutshell, it was staring us all in the face and we all missed it until now.

In another Post I will describe what I believe to be the process used by Police to create the photograph of the code that we are all familiar with.

The Truth Was Hidden In Plain Sight All The Time..




SOMERTON MAN: Code Letter Analysis: Right Lower Quadrant & Q stage 2

$
0
0

The Individual Letter Project is Underway


Lower right quadrant images

This is a group of 7 letters from the lower right quadrant of the code page, I've uploaded this image to give you some idea of the scale of the task and just how much work needs to be done. You may notice the letters all have content and some are reasonably visible but work still has to be done to bring up the detail that everyone wants. Note the line that continues through the A, Q and C. Does that mean that it wasn't actually a letter A?


Letter Q Initial and Stage 2 Comparison


As you can see the image on the left is from the original Somerton Man Code page from the copy of the Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam found and associated with him and on the right, the image is the same one but with color shades partially removed and this is what you see. There is a question as to whether the SA Police were actually able to see this detail to the same extent as we see it here, subject of another post at a later time.

Obviously more work to do to lift and properly identify the letters and numbers but their markings are visible all the way around the letter Q in the right hand image. In fact if you look carefully, you can just about see darker grey markings in the left hand image.

A word of caution, there will be at least another version of this image and it will be clearer, I've released this one to show progress to date.

The process is slow and quite tedious, removing the various shades of grey from a number of areas around this one letter takes time. The letter Q has taken a number of hours to get to this stage, there are 50 letters in total plus other markings to be analysed in this way.

These are not smudge marks, they are deliberately written micro letters and numbers.

I should point out that the original image file of the code page came from the University of Adelaide and is a 400 DPI version. I have a copy of that for download from this blog or you may prefer to use the University version.




Your comments, input and thoughts are welcome, I will be doing further work on this and then listing the letters/numbers on the blog. Call back in a few days and that should be done and then on to the next letter.

SOMERTON MAN: Micro Writing Latest Release of Letter Q.

$
0
0

LATEST RELEASE LETTER Q





8X32505683 EX3K
This is the latest view of our fist letter, the letter Q from line 4 of the code page. You should be able to make out the string of letters/numbers in the lower area of Q and in the upper curve area there's a lengthy string of letters/numbers which are just about visible on screen, stiil working on those and should be able to show them a little clearer by tomorrow. To get to this stage, I used Paint.net, it's a free image editing tool, and its colour replacement tools with a tinted filter as you can see.

I will be publishing an extended list of the letters/numbers  from the letter Q in the next day or so. In the meantime, the letters/numbers in the first part of the lower half commencing next to the line stroke are:

I make it out to be 8X32505683 EX3K after this the writing is much more difficult to make out as follows:

In the upper curve area I am able to make out most of the string as follows:|

X4423546 X28V806 X754382 2025849345V

I will be doing more work on these and they may need to be recitified.

By the way, in order for me to make these out I am using a very high resolution screen. It may not be possible for you to see it the same on a standard PC or laptop screen, an Iphone is good though. You can achieve the same effect if you have access to a Data Projector, I would recommend 2800 lumens +

I feel confident that the recovery process will improve so please be patient with me as we gather momentum.

Note how the individual letters and numbers are closely packed together and then note the insertion of the letter X at intervals. I suspect that the X is a separator between the coded letters/numbers. There is a precedent for this type of micro writing, a German WW2 agent was interviewed a few years after the war and he spoke of his work and demonstrated his ability to a reporter at the time, unfortunately there weren't any images in the article but here's the link for your information: Heinrich Schmitz, it's an amazing story. A few years later a man of the same name was arrested, he had been a member of the Gestapo and was found guilty of war crimes.

I have borrowed some techniques used by the US National Library of Congress who recently were succesful in 'lfiting' a handwritten word from behind another handwritten word found on the draft of the Declaration of Independence. Amazing stuff. Unfortunately I don't have the tools that they have so we just have to improvise.

I will be putting up a special page which you will find shortly to the right of the post area, the idea is to place eah image with a short description and list of letters and numbers found. Please bear in mind that some of the characters may not be readily recoverable and it may take a little time to achieve reasonable visibility.

Your comments and input is very welcome especially f you are able to make out more information than I have posted here. Lots more to come.

SOMERTON MAN: Venom or Venona? More Micro Writing From Code Page

$
0
0

BEYOND ULTRA SECRET?


Found between the S & A in the last line of the code page

If true, this find puts a whole new perspective on the nature of the Code page.

In a recent interview with the Advertiser down in Adelaide, I discussed various aspects of the Somerton Man Case with a particular focus on the Code page as you might expect.

We covered a lot of ground with the reporter, Lynton Grace being extremely interested so we delved a little further than would normaly have been the case.

I mentioned to him that apart from the micro writing found within the 'letters' of the code page, there were also reasonable examples to be found in the open space surrounding the letters.

One of those examples lay between the S and the A of the last line of the code and slightly beneath them.

The writing appears to spell out 2YRS  42 and then beneath that another word which is either VENOM or VENONA with the following alongside: X4561. I told Lynton that the options were Venom which was the name of a British Jet Fighter which at the time was a top secret project, still on the drawing boards in 1948 but tenders had been called to my understanding and I also understood that these tenders had a numbering system with an X prefix followed by 4 numbers.

The other option which was extremely secret at the time was that this find could relate to a project known as VENONA, what's very interesting about this project was that it also used a numbering system with an X prefix and importantly these numbers were allocated by US intelligence. That would mean that if the word was VENONA then there is only one source from which it could have come, a US intelligence officer. My words to Lynton were that I still had work to do on this option.

You can download a copy of the National Security Agency PDF, The Venona Story, here..


Of interest is the stylised nature of the letter X, it is quite unusual and I suspect it may yet be found elsewhere and associated with this case.

I have to say that the work done by the Advertiser and Channel 7 in Adelaide has added greatly to the level of public interest and awareness of the Somerton Man case, I think it a good possibility that someone may come forward with more information.

Coincidentally a keen eyed follower of this blog had asked the question as to whether it could be VENONA at around the same time as the interview.

There's another post in the next few days that dicusses the VENONA project and it's Australian links in more detail.

Note: All are welcome to view and download any material found on this blog including images and documents. All I ask that if you are going to quote any of the posts then please do so as much as possible in their entirety and please clearly acknowledge the source. There have been instances were part posts have been selectively quoted leaving the new reader with an entirely different view of the thrust of the original information.

SOMERTON MAN: Code Letter Analysis, 'G' from GAR sequence

$
0
0

Letter G from GAR Sequence Last Line of Code Page

First Close up Image of G from GAR sequence, last line of code

Image taken of the letter G, this is the best we have been able to do thus far with a reasonably clear, but a little blurred, string of letters and numbers within the curve of the letter. The next one will be clearer.

My reading of this section is:

IRY27V  X235560  5X?D 23

I will gladly leave the code to others, not my strong suite! If you are seeing a different set of letters/numbers then please advise and we can post your views if you wish.

In the background you may be able to make out some of the numbering on the S and the T.

This is further and in my view overwhelming evidence of the existence of microwriting on the code page with much more to come.

Again I am using a high resolution screen and printer where necessary together with LED lighting and I have use of a 2800 Lumen data projector with which the micro writing is quite clear.
Viewing all 1073 articles
Browse latest View live